MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106363321 · doi:10.1590/1980531411454_pt

DISPOSITIVOS DE PESQUISA-FORMAÇÃO PARA PROFISSIONALIZAR OS(AS) PROFESSORES(AS)

2025· article· W7106363321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Pesquisa · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Process (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo As questões referentes à relação entre pesquisa e formação continuam sendo um elemento essencial na formação das(os) professoras(es). A fim de refletir sobre as contribuições da pesquisa, analisamos as relações entre pesquisa e formação a partir da colocação em perspectiva de dois dispositivos, um desenvolvido na Suíça e o outro no Quebec. Esses dispositivos mobilizam atividades oriundas da pesquisa em educação a serviço do desenvolvimento profissional das(os) professoras(es) e contribuem para seu ingresso na profissão em boas condições. Em nossa perspectiva, este trabalho permite levantar indicações úteis para a concepção e a implementação de dispositivos adequados na formação inicial e contínua de professoras(es).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it