Enhancing Digital Marketing Strategies in the Food Delivery Business through AI-Driven Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The digital marketing for food delivery business is the focus of this study, which investigates the use of ensemble machine learning (ML) approaches. The study's overarching goal is to pave the way for artificial intelligence (AI)-based recommendations by analyzing consumer data with the hope of discovering consumer preferences and predicting behavior. In order to improve the accuracy of predictions, the ensemble method combines the results of decision trees, naïve Bayes, and k-nearest neighbor algorithms. Both the decision tree and nearest neighbor algorithms were able to obtain perfect predictions with zero error and 100% accuracy, as seen in the accuracy matrix charts. On the other hand, the naïve Bayes method was able to accurately identify labels in all classes with a minimal error rate of 0.028 and a high accuracy of 97.175%. With a success rate of over 90%, the majority vote method allows models to be integrated using less than 50% of the randomized data, which minimizes customer dissatisfaction. When taken as a whole, these ML algorithms greatly improve the efficiency and efficacy of food delivery business digital marketing campaigns by cutting down on wasted time and money.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".