Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marshallora cf. modesta (C. B. Adams, 1850) (Fig. 2B) Cerithium modestum C. B. Adams, 1850: 117. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Guadeloupe. KARUBENTHOS 1 • 2 spm; sta. GM01; MNHN • 1 sh, 3 spm; sta. GM02; MNHN • 2 spm; sta. GM03; MNHN • 2 sh; sta. GM11; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. GM29; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. GS30; MNHN • 3 sh; sta. GD39; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. GD49; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. GD51; MNHN. — Martinique. MADIBENTHOS. ‘Sud Atlantique’ • 1 sh; sta. AM042; MNHN • 2 sh [one with hermit crab]; sta. AM043; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. AM325; MNHN. ‘Sud Caraibe’ • 1 sh; sta. AB150; MNHN. ‘Baie de Fort-de-France’ • 1 sh; sta. AM034; MNHN • 8 sh; sta. AB390; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. AB392; MNHN • 3 sh; sta. AB394; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. AD603; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. AD607; MNHN • 1 sh; sta. AD623; MNHN. BATHYMETRIC DISTRIBUTION. — Recorded depth in Guadeloupe: 0-15 m (live specimens at 1 m). Recorded depth in Martinique: 0- 13 m. Previous recorded depth in the West Atlantic: 0-20 m (Rosenberg 2009). REMARKS As abovementioned, the illustration of M. modesta from Guadeloupe by Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2015: fig. 4L) actually refers to C. dupliniana, whereas their record of Marshallora nigrocincta (C. B. Adams, 1839) must be refused, because this species is known with certainty only from Canada and USA, based on DNA evidences and some shell features (Fernandes et al. 2021). Accordingly, the record of M. nigrocincta from Guadeloupe and Martinique by Lamy & Pointier (2018) is rejected. The material from the French Antilles will be studied under an integrative taxonomic basis, together with new samples from the West Atlantic (unpublished data). Meanwhile, shells are herein identified as M. cf. modesta, regarding the existence of at least two Caribbean species in this complex (Fernandes et al. 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".