MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106787855 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726992

Acalypha radula Baker

2023· article· W7106787855 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerophyllWoodlandEndangered speciesCritically endangeredEndemismHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

42. Acalypha radula Baker Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany. London 20: 254 (Baker 1883). — Type: Madagascar: “ Central Madagascar ”, 1882, R. Baron 1818 (lecto-, designated here: K [K000186509]; isolecto-, P [P00513119, P00513120]). Acalypha hildebrandtii Baill., Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Paris 2: 1005, 1180 (Baillon 1892). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Fianarantsoa, “Betsileo, Nandahizana”, J. M. Hildebrandt 3900 (lecto-, designated here: P[P00513121]; isolecto-, BREM[BREM_0001783], G[G00074184, G00190630], JE[JE00000288, JE00000289], K[K000186507], M[M0110604], P[P00513122]). Acalypha salviifolia Baill., Étude générale du Groupe de Euphorbiacées 443 (Baillon 1858), nom. nud. Tragia salviaefolia Boj. ex Baill., Étude générale du Groupe de Euphorbiacées 443 (Baillon 1858), nom. nud. ICONOGRAPHY. — Baillon (1891: pl. 193); Figs 65F; 69D. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet is taken from the Latin word ‘radula’, scraper, probably in reference to the rough appearance of the leaf surface. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Alaotra-Mangoro, Analamanga, Itasy, Vakinankaratra, Amoron’i Mania, and Haute Matsiatra). Sclerophyllous woodlands and secondary forest. On basement rocks. Altitudinal range (800-) 1500-2000 m (Fig. 63). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha radula is estimated to be 33 908 km 2 and its AOO 60 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows in the sclerophyllous woodlands in the highlands (see assessment of A. leptomyura). This species has been collected in degraded forests and in unprotected areas, and in many localities. Its habitat is subject to various threats (uncontrolled fires for grazing and crops, charcoal production), so we predict that ongoing habitat loss and degradation will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha radula is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) under criterion B. It meets the AOO values needed for a threatened category, but the number of locations is too high to meet the conditions required for a listing under the Endangered category. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 28 collections. Madagascar. Anonymous 9628 (P[P00513109]); Anonymous s.n. (P[P00513097]); Baron, R. 272 (P[P00513096]), 1818 (K[K000186509], P[P00513119, P00513120]), 4068 (K[K000384473]); Benoist, M.R. 244 (P[P00513098]); Bojer, W. s.n. (P[P00724168]); Bosser, M.J. 15133 (P[P04779790, P04779793]), 19481 (P[P04779797]); Catat, L.D.M. 413 (P[P00513099]); d’Alleizette, Ch. s.n. (L[L0242131]); Decary, R. 13008 (P[P00513100]); Gillespie, L. 10757 (MO), 10758 (MO); Hildebrandt, J.M. 3865 (BREM [BREM_0001787], G[G00034245], P[P00513101, P00513102, P00513103]), 3900 (BREM [BREM_0001783], G[G00074184, G00190630], JE[JE00000288, JE00000289], K[K000186507], M[M0110604], P[P00513121, P00513122]); Humbert, H. 4575 (P[P00513107]), 29970 (G, P[P05547266]); Jard.Bot.Tananarive 2528 (P[P00513106]), 4537 (P[P00513104, P00513105]); Le Myre de Villers, M. s.n. (P[P00513108]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 9672 (P[P00513110, P00513111]), 9862 (P[P00513116]), 13357 (P[P00513114, P00513115]); Razafimandimbison, S. 1359 (S[S16-50647]); Service Forestier Madagascar 45-SF (P[P00513112]), s.n. (P[P00513113]); Viguier, R. 1836 (P[P00513118]). REFERENCES. — Baillon (1861: 268) as A. salviifolia; Müller Argoviensis (1866: 889) as A. salviifolia; Baillon (1891: 193); Baillon (1892: 1004) as A. salviifolia; Baillon (1895a: 1180) as A. hildebrandtii; Palacký (1907: 25) as A. hildebrandtii; Palacký (1907: 26); Palacký (1907: 26) as A. salviifolia; Pax & Hoffmann (1924: 102) as A. salviifolia; Pax & Hoffmann (1924: 156) as A. hildebrandtii; Leandri (1942: 278); Leandri (1952); Jenkins (1987: 347); Jenkins (1990: 408, 433); Govaerts et al. (2000: 67) as A. hildebrandtii; Govaerts et al. (2000: 85, 86, 105) as A. salviifolia; Schatz (2001: 142); Sagun et al. (2006: 124); Seebaluck et al. (2015: 149, 153); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 108). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, evergreen, to 2.5 m tall, monoecious or dioecious. Branches densely pubescent with simple, short, more or less appressed trichomes and hyaline trichomes to 0.8 mm long, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 2 × 1.5 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, blackish, pubescent with simple, short trichomes. Stipules to 8 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, midrib thick, margin scarious, appressed-pubescent, especially on midrib. Petioles 0.5-2.2(- 3) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches and with scattered short, glandular trichomes. Leaf blades conspicuously bullate, 6-10 × (1.5-)2-3(-3.5) cm, narrowly triangular-lanceolate to linear-lanceolate, subchartaceous; base rounded to truncate, sometimes subcordate; apex rounded to acute; margin serrate, teeth subacute, irregular; upper surface pubescent with simple, short, erect, trichomes on top of blisters and on main veins and scattered, short, glandular trichomes, denser on veins near base, and sometimes stellate or fasciculate trichomes; lower surface pubescent with simple, thin trichomes, denser on veins, and sometimes stellate or fasciculate trichomes; venation actinodromous, basal veins 5, secondary veins 6-10 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform, unisexual, axillary. Male inflorescences densely flowered, to 5 cm long; peduncle to 8 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, narrowly spatulate, sparsely hairy and ciliate with simple trichomes, and with short, glandular trichomes. Female inflorescences densely flowered, to 6 cm long; peduncle to 8 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; bracts 4-9, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 12 × 14 mm, subtriangular-reniform, pubescent with simple, thin, erect, trichomes and thick, glandular trichomes to 1 mm long, ciliate; margin subentire to shallowly dentate; teeth c. 39, triangular, with glandular trichomes, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles to 1.5 mm long, triangular, pubescent with simple, short trichomes and ciliate. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.8 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 1 mm diameter, sparsely hairy. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.8 mm long, oblong-lanceolate, sparsely hairy and ciliate; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, smooth, surface hispid with simple, short, erect trichomes, and with glandular trichomes; styles 3, to 5 mm long, slightly connate at base, sparsely hairy on rachis, each divided into 9-10 segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present at female inflorescence apex, occasionally at male inflorescence apex; pedicel filiform, to 20 mm long, sparsely hairy; ovary 1-lobed, to 3 mm diameter, puberulent with simple, short trichomes, distally fimbriate; style 1, to 1 mm long, glabrous. Capsules to 5 mm diameter, smooth, surface sparsely hairy with simple, short, erect trichomes and glandular trichomes to 1.3 mm long. Seeds c. 3 × 2 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate. NOTES 1) Baker designated R. Baron 1818 as the type specimen of Acalypha radula but did not indicate the herbarium. We found three specimens of this collection, designating the best preserved of them as the lectotype; and 2) Baillon designated J.M. Hildebrandt 3900 as the type of Acalypha hildebrandtii but did not indicate the herbarium. We found nine specimens of this collection, designating the best preserved of them as the lectotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207