MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7106797937 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726939

Acalypha crateriana I. Montero & Cardiel 2023, comb. nov.

2023· article· W7106797937 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvergreenDeforestation (computer science)Range (aeronautics)Flora (microbiology)RainforestTaxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12. Acalypha crateriana (Coode) I.Montero & Cardiel, comb. nov. Acalypha integrifolia Willd. subsp. marginata (Poir.) Coode var. crateriana Coode, Kew Bulletin 34: 44 (Coode 1979). — Type: Mauritius. Tamarin Falls, 2.III.1975, D. Lorence 1138 (holo-, K [K000431104]; iso-, K [K000431105], MAU [n.v.]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Unknown. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet probably refers to the Kanaka crater in Mauritius. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to the Mascarene Islands (Mauritius). Degraded lowland evergreen moist forest. Altitudinal range 700-800 m (Fig. 26). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha crateriana comb. nov. is only known from Kanaka crater and Grand Bassin peak in Mauritius. Its EOO is estimated to be 12.9 km 2 and its AOO 12 km 2. Native forest remnants of Mauritius are very restricted, covering less than 5% of the total landmass. This massive deforestation is due mainly to agriculture and urban expansion. Another threat to the Mauritius native flora is the widespread occurrence of alien species. Native plants are seriously affected by invasive plants, reducing their growth rate so regeneration of forests is extremely low (Safford 1997; Florens 2008; Baider & Florens 2013; Norder et al. 2017). No specimens of this species have been collected for 45 years. In recognition of its restricted geographic range (a single known location), the cited threats, and the absence of recent collections, A. crateriana comb. nov. is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(ii,iii,iv). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 16 collections. Mauritius. Coode, M.J.E. 4694 (K), 4700 (K), 4701 (P[P04779343]), 4704 (K), 4705 (K, MO[MO-2452045]), 4718 (K), 4720 (K), 4721 (P[P04779349]), 4722 (K), 4729 (K), 4732 (K, MO[MO-2452041]), 4737 (K), 4744 (K, MO[MO-2452042]), 4748 (P[P04779342]); Lorence, D. 1138 (K[K000431104, K000431105]), DL1858 (MO [MO-2452048], P[P04779346]). REFERENCES. — Coode (1982: 74); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 104) as A. marginata. DESCRIPTION Shrubs, leaf persistence unknown, to 2.7 m tall, probably dioecious. Branches appressed-pubescent, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds naked, hispid. Stipules to 5 mm long, linear-lanceolate, densely pubescent with simple, appressed trichomes, margin papillate. Petioles 0.5-0.8 cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches, glabrescent. Leaf blades 4-7(-10) × 1.5-3cm, elliptic to subobovate, chartaceous; base acute to cuneate; apex rounded to acute; margin crenate to crenate-dentate, slightly revolute, usually reddish or pinkish, teeth rounded; upper surface glabrous; lower surface sparsely hairy with appressed trichomes on veins; venation pinnate, secondary veins 7-8 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform (male) or glomerulate (female), unisexual, axillary. Male inflorescences to 5 cm long; peduncle to 5 mm long, indumentum similar to that on petioles; flowers glomerate; bracts to 1 mm long, triangular, appressed-pubescent. Female inflorescences 2-4 mm long;sessile; bracts 1-4, not enlarging in fruit, to 0.5 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, appressed-pubescent; margin entire; bracteoles absent. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.6 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 0.5 mm diameter, sparsely hairy. Female flowers 1 per bract, subsessile; sepals 3, to 1 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, appressed-pubescent; ovary c. 1 mm diameter,3-lobed,papillose, surface densely hispid; styles 3, to 4 mm long, distinct, sparsely hairy on rachis, each divided into 10-11 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, papillose-hispid, papillae ending in a simple, trichome to 1 mm long, surface sparsely hairy with simple, short trichomes, glabrescent. Seeds c. 1 × 0.7 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate. NOTE Acalypha crateriana comb. nov. was treated by Coode (1979) as variety of A. integrifolia subsp. marginata, treated here as A. marginata. We consider A. crateriana comb. nov. to be a distinct species distinguished mainly by having petioles 0.5- 0.8 cm long and leaf blades 4-7(-10) × 1.5-3 cm, elliptic to subobovate; base acute to cuneate; apex rounded to acute; margin crenate to crenate-dentate, usually reddish or pinkish, slightly revolute, teeth rounded; vs petioles 0.5-3 cm long and leaf blades (4-)6-17-(21) × (2-)2.5-7(-8) cm, usually elliptic to elliptic-lanceolate, sometimes obovate; base rounded to cuneate; apex acute to subacuminate; margin crenate-serrate to serrate, discolorous, teeth rounded to acute, slightly callose-edged in A. marginata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→