MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106798070 · doi:10.14288/cjur.v7i1.194085

Gadolinium Contrast Agents in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

2021· article· en· W7106798070 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingImage contrastGadoliniumContrast (vision)Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imagingMedical imagingSpin echo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has proven to be one of the most powerful clinical diagnostic tools. Based on chemical principles discovered in the 1940s, MRI uses magnetic fields to excite bulk water protons throughout the body, creating an image from their responses. Although useful for the diagnosis of a variety of diseases and conditions, a lack of image clarity can result in incorrect or missed diagnoses. Due to the inherent challenges with MRI, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used to modulate the response of the bulk water protons to the external magnetic fields, subsequently increasing the image contrast. Here, we discuss GBCAs and their role in overcoming the challenges with magnetic resonance (MR) image clarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207