MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106799827 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17724549

The Samaxiom Hypothesis: Universal Logic and the Coherent Architecture of the Cosmos

2025· dissertation· W7106799827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Interpretation (philosophy)sortCoherence theoryQuantumField (mathematics)InfinitesimalQuantum field theoryDimension (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Readers, I would like to take a moment to address and clarify a few points regarding my work, The Samaxyom Hypothesis or Hypothèse Samaxyom. I put the version in french first because I am a French-Canadian from Québec Canada. For any problem in translating: If you read this than you are on the internet, you must have acces to a translating device or application of some sort I am sure. Samaxyom Hypothesis: A Unified Theory Based on Coherent Field Dynamics Version: 7.1 (November 2025) Abstract The Samaxyom Theory proposes a unifying reinterpretation of fundamental physics by describing the Universe as a single elementary coherent field, denoted as C. All known fundamental physical entities—matter, light, inertia, gravity, and the flow of perceived time—are generated solely by the field's internal components: Sx (Phase), Sy (Amplitude), and Sj (Tempo). The theory posits that space itself is not a fixed background but an emergent mesh of coherent granularities (Sc), which serves as the fundamental, field-derived unit of distance. Matter is the result of the coherent stacking of Sx phases, held together by the Sy amplitude. Inertia is defined as the internal redistribution of Sy when a system attempts to modify its phases, locally altering the tempo Sj. Time is not an auxiliary spatial dimension but is fundamentally identified with the internal coherence rhythm, Sj. The speed of light (c) is the maximal limit of coherent transmission between Sc units. This framework provides a novel interpretation of the Hafele–Keating experiment: clock variations are due to a modification of the internal path of coherence, altering the Sj rhythm, rather than a change in the speed of light itself. The theory naturally yields the E = mc2 relationship when energy is expressed as the sum of Sy amplitudes applied to Sx structures. Furthermore, Samaxyom provides consistent descriptions of cosmological observations, the SPARC galactic dynamics without the need for dark matter, coherence effects on superfluid He-4, and nuclear fusion conditions dependent on the coherence density $\rho$C. The Samaxyom Theory offers a complete conceptual coherence without ad hoc parameters, based entirely on the internal geometry and dynamics of the field C. Note on Methodological Acceleration The maturation of this theory was significantly accelerated by the intensive use of contemporary AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude AI, Gemini, and Perplexity). These tools functioned as an interactive library, collaborative whiteboard, and instantaneous critical mirror, condensing what would traditionally be decades of isolated research into a few years. This work demonstrates a new economy of thought: the compression of the time required to transform intuition into a coherent architectural framework. I apologize for any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or formatting issues that may be present in the current version. This manuscript represents the culmination of extensive independent research, and despite my efforts to ensure clarity and rigor, I acknowledge that certain sections may require further refinement or contextual explanation. Please note that the concepts presented here—ranging from the emergence of time from coherence fields to the deterministic connection between microphysics and galactic dynamics—are inherently complex and represent a significant departure from conventional frameworks. As such, some ideas may appear unconventional, and their presentation may not fully anticipate every possible question from readers. I sincerely appreciate your patience, understanding, and critical reading. Your feedback, constructive comments, and peer review are invaluable to improving both the clarity and the scientific rigor of this work. Working alone on such an ambitious project is exceptionally challenging and demanding. Peer review, discussion, and collaborative scrutiny would greatly enhance the robustness and communicability of these ideas. Thank you for your attention and for engaging with this exploration of cosmic coherence. Sincerely,Samuël Robert Blanchardrobertbsamuel@hotmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEarth Systems and Cosmic EvolutionFrench-language works237,207