MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7106800575 · doi:10.14288/cjur.v9i2.200106

The Role of Histone Demethylases in the Epigenetic Regulation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

2024· article· en· W7106800575 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsHistoneEpigenomicsTranscription factorRegulation of gene expressionContext (archaeology)Epigenetic regulation of neurogenesisEpigenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ever-increasing rise in the occurrence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) presents a need to understand its development and progression with a goal of advancing novel treatment options. Epigenetics encompasses numerous modifications that mediate gene regulation amidst diverse genetic and environmental conditions. Specifically, histone methylations play a key role in the regulation of lipogenic gene expression and, like other epigenetic modifications, are inherently reversible. This presents an array of options for therapeutic intervention. This review explores the roles of specific histone demethylases and their dynamic relationships with transcription factors and target genes involved in NAFLD. I summarize how, in addition to enhancing disease progression, these histone modifications can conversely act to protect from harmful side effects of this disease. I suggest areas of future investigation into additional transcription and epigenetic factors that have yet to be studied in this context and are necessary to further our understanding of NAFLD and to develop novel treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→