A Geobioelectromagnetic Theory of Psychological Time: Planetary-scale Coherence Fields and the Reversal of the Subjective Temporal Arrow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This theoretical manuscript presents a novel, synthetic model explaining themalleability of the human psychological arrow of time. We propose that specific geologicalformations, such as the ancient rock of Newfoundland and the vast, thrustingpeaks of the Himalayas, generate powerful, localized electromagnetic anomalieswhich act as distinct coherence fields. We theorize that humans, as carbon-basedopen systems, can interact with these fields, leading to a phase transition in cognitivestructure. This transition is modeled through a synthesis of concepts: thethermodynamics of entropy (Boltzmann’s S = k logW), the logical states of information(Belnap-Dunn logic), and a phase diagram analogy based on carbonallotropes and steel metallurgy. The model posits that immersion in a planetarycoherence field can reduce cognitive entropy (ΔS < 0), resulting in a measurableslowing or subjective reversal of psychological time, experienced as healing and rejuvenation.This framework provides a testable, biophysical basis for the reputedeffects of sacred sites and outlines a potential new field of geotherapeutic intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".