MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106811541 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17726986

Acalypha nusbaumeri I. Montero & Cardiel

2023· article· W7106811541 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStipuleDeciduousPetiole (insect anatomy)EndemismLeaflet (botany)Conservation status

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

37. Acalypha nusbaumeri I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 140: 69 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2020b). — Type: Madagascar. Reg. Sava [Prov. Antsiranana], sous-préfecture de Vohemar, commune rurale de Daraina, forêt de Bekaraoka, partie nord, 13°06’S, 49°42’E, 177 m, 13.II.2004, L. Nusbaumer & P. Ranirison LN1169 (holo-, G [G00028080]; iso-, K, MO, P [P01152829, P05547228]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2020b); Figs 57H; 69A. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors Louis Nusbaumer, researcher and curator at the Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Switzerland. Nusbaumer works on the systematics, phylogeny, biogeography, and conservation of Malagasy plants and is also the collector, with Patrick Ranirison, of the type specimen of this species. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Sava). Mainly in dry deciduous forest. On basement rocks. Altitudinal range 200-351 m (Fig. 58). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha nusbaumeri is only known from one collection from Loky-Manambato site (see assessment of A. menavody). Its EOO could not be calculated; its AOO is estimated to be 8 km 2. Acalypha nusbaumeri is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(ii,iii). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 1 collection. Madagascar: Nusbaumer, L. LN 1169 (G[G00028080], K, MO, P[P05547228, P 01152829]). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, probably deciduous, to 0.8 m tall, divaricately branched, monoecious. Branches blackish, pubescent with simple, curved, antrorse trichomes, glabrous when mature. Axillary buds spherical, to 1 mm diameter, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, membranous, brownish, external perule dentate, sparsely hairy. Stipules to 2 mm long, triangular-lanceolate, midrib prominent, sparsely hairy with simple, short, erect trichomes. Petioles slender, 2-3.5(-4.5) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades 5-8.5 × 2.5-5 cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, thin-membranous; base obtuse to rounded; apex subacuminate, acumen to 0.5 mm long, rounded, mucronate; margin crenate-serrate, teeth rounded; upper and lower surfaces subglabrous, with some simple, short, curved, antrorse trichomes on veins; axils of secondary veins with sparsely hairy, pocket-shaped domatia; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3 or 5, secondary veins 3-4 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, axillary, to 1.7 cm long, mostly male with 1 female bract at base; peduncle thick, to 5 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Female segment: bract 1, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 2 × 2.5 mm, orbicular-reniform, translucent, subglabrous, with simple, short trichomes on teeth and veins; margin crenate, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles to 0.5 mm long, linear-lanceolate, sparsely hairy with simple, short trichomes, margin with some sessile glands. Male segment persistent, to 0.7 cm long; bracts to 0.5 mm long, triangular, ciliate. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds c. to 0.8 mm diameter, glabrous, papillose. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 1 mm long, lanceolate, ciliate with simple, short trichomes; ovary to 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, densely papillose, papillae minute, surface hispid; styles 3, to 3.5 mm long, distinct, sparsely hairy, each divided into 8-10 slender segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules (immature) to 2 mm diameter, echinate, projections to 1 mm long, surface sparsely hairy with simple, short erect trichomes c. 0.5 mm long. Seeds too young to describe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207