MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7106811554 · doi:10.14288/cjur.v9i2.198703

Microglia-Specific Genetic Factors in Autism Spectrum Disorder Etiology

2023· article· en· W7106811554 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyAutism spectrum disorderAutismGeneCandidate geneWeb of scienceGenetic data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heritable condition that is associated with microglial and synaptic dysfunction. This review investigates the relationship between microglia-related gene expression and ASD. Methods: The initial search strategy generated 371 articles from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria was 1) data on microglial genes, 2) ASD condition, 3) English language, 4) genetic data available. Results: After screening, 27 studies were included. Study design subsections were separated into 1) randomized experimental and 2) case-control. Most studies either fully or partially supported the involvement of microglia-related genes in ASD etiology. Conclusions: This review summarizes the gene-microglial interactions in ASD. CX3CR1 and PTEN were implicated in the greatest number of studies with direct reference to microglial involvement. However, studies contradicting gene-microglial involvement in ASD were also present. Additional study of the microglial-genetic link may further the understanding of ASD etiology and aid in the development of therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→