MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7106829644 · doi:10.2196/81291

Evaluating a Culturally Tailored Digital Storytelling Intervention to Improve Trauma Awareness in Conflict-Affected Eastern Congo: Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study

2025· article· en· W7106829644 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversité de Lausanne
KeywordsDigital storytellingIntervention (counseling)Mental healthDigital literacyDigital mediaCulturally appropriatemHealthCultural competenceDigital healthHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in conflict-affected regions like eastern Democratic Republic of Congo; yet, cultural stigma and lack of psychoeducation limit public understanding and help-seeking behaviors. Objective This study evaluates the effect of a short, culturally adapted animated video on mental health perception, knowledge, and attitudes toward trauma. Methods A community-based quasi-experimental pre-post design was implemented among 239 participants from South Kivu. The intervention involved viewing a 3-minute animated psychoeducational video portraying locally relevant PTSD symptoms and resilience strategies. Perception, knowledge, and attitude scores were measured before and after the intervention, alongside PTSD prevalence and video appreciation. Results Out of 239, 40% (n=96) of the participants screened positively for PTSD. Post intervention, significant improvements were observed in perception (P=.01), knowledge (P<.001), and attitudes (P=.001) toward trauma. Appreciation was high; 82% (n= 195) expressed empathy for the characters, and 74% (n= 176) were likely to share the video. Linear regression showed that having PTSD symptoms (β coefficient=3.29, SE=1.09; P=.003), years of education (β coefficient=0.54, SE=0.08; P<.001), empathy toward the portrayed situations (β coefficient=5.07, SE=0.56; P<.001), perceived acquisition of new knowledge (β coefficient=2.58, SE=0.59; P<.001) and willingness to share the video (β coefficient=1.75, SE=0.50; P=.001) predicted stronger positive effect. A multiple linear regression including all predictors revealed that PTSD symptoms (β coefficient=1.93, SE=0.90; P=.03), years of education (β coefficient=0.47, SE=0.07; P<.001), empathy toward the portrayed situations (β coefficient=3.50, SE=0.55; P<.001), and willingness to share the video (β coefficient=1.75, SE=0.50; P=.001) remained significant predictors of video impact. Age and perceived acquisition of new knowledge were not significant in the multivariate model. This model accounted for 44.6% of the variance in video impact scores (R2=0.446, F6,231=30.99, P<.001). Conclusions This study highlights the effectiveness of culturally grounded, low-cost digital media for improving mental health literacy in postconflict settings. Video-based tools may serve as scalable components of trauma-informed care and public health communication in low-resource, high-need areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Mental Health→Same topicDigital Storytelling and Education→French-language works237,207→