Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acalypha spiciflora Burm.f. Flora Indica 203: pl. 61-2 (Burman 1768). — Claoxylon spiciflorum (Burm.f.) A.Juss., De Euphorbiacearum generibus medicisque earumdem viribus tentamen 43 (Jussieu 1824). — Cleidion spiciflorum (Burm.f.) Merr., An Interpretation of Rumphius’s Herbarium Amboinense 322 (Merrill 1917). REMARKS Acalypha spiciflora Burm. f. was described and illustrated in Burman’s Flora Indica, but the plate and the description are very imprecise. Subsequently, Poiret (1804) cited under this name a specimen in the Lamarck herbarium (P00382113) from La Réunion. That specimen is morphologically close to Burman’s plate, but it is not an Acalypha species. Later, Jussieu (1824) combined A. spiciflora under the genus Claoxylon, as Claoxylon spiciflorum, and Merrill (1917) combined it under Cleidion, as Cleidion spiciflorum, the name that is currently accepted. Müller Argoviensis (1866) wrongly placed Acalypha spiciflora as a synonym of A. acuminata Vahl ex Baill. Pax & Hoffmann (1924) andLeandri (1942) followed Müller’s treatment but, applying the rule of priority, chose A. spiciflora as the accepted name. This is the origin of the confusion in the use of this name.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".