Bibliographic record
Abstract
of Humanities and Social Sciences (FHSS) and Arizona State University (ASU) in January 2021.This workshop illuminated the breadth and depth of their research, highlighting the themes and frameworks that weaved together and unified our project.Based on this research, they then submitted extraordinarily rich, sophisticated, and trail-blazing chapters of which we, the editors, are immensely proud.All this work has been done amid the global pandemic and political turmoil.In such circumstances, tackling the intersections of the Holocaust, sexualized violence, and liberation brought new layers of intellectual, logistical, and emotional challenges.We are therefore that much more grateful for our colleagues/contributors' tremendous expertise, perseverance, and resilience.So many times we exchanged words of encouragement, understanding, and support as many of us not only faced the social and political realities of the day, but also the fragile health of loved ones, and even the pain of losing those dearest to us.These past couple of years left scars that will not heal easily.We also thank our project participants who shared their expertise and findings at several scholarly venues: Stefan Cristian Ionescu chaired the panel "The Grey Zone of Soviet Liberation: History and Memory of Sexual Violence" with presentations 2, no.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".