A novel clustering based curvature method with wavelet transform for detecting progressive damage of simply supported ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams using laser scanner vibrometer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring the structural performance of Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) beams is essential for understanding damage progression and improving long-term durability in advanced structural elements. This study presents a novel reference-free clustering-based algorithm that leverages high spatial resolution and higher vibrational modes obtained using a laser scanning vibrometer (LSV) during a progressive damage test on UHPFRC. In the experimental phase, the vibrational behavior of a 2-meter one-span simply-supported UHPFRC beam was measured by laser scanning vibrometry under progressively increasing damage levels. Two different reference-free damage detection methods are developed and compared. In the first method, the curvature is calculated using the central difference approximation, and a clustering-based algorithm combining LoOP outlier detection with locally weighted nonparametric regression fitting using a second-order polynomial (LOESS) is applied to construct an intact baseline directly from the damaged data. In the second method, a wavelet-based curvature formulation is introduced to overcome the noise sensitivity and boundary effects inherent in central difference schemes. Both approaches are evaluated for their ability to identify damage zone characteristics, such as position and severity, and are validated through finite element simulations where strain energy variation is used as a numerical severity index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it