Détermination des termes du bilan hydrologique d'un sous-bassin versant du Bandama Blanc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire présente une étude visant à déterminer les termes du bilan hydrologique d'un sous-bassin versant du Bandama Blanc. Il comprend une synthèse bibliographique sur la zone d'étude (localisation géographique, réseau hydrographique, caractéristiques morphométriques, régime hydrologique, géologie, géomorphologie, végétation, climat, évaporation) et les éléments de contexte théoriques sur le bilan hydrologique et les composantes du cycle hydrologique (précipitations, évaporation et évapotranspiration, interception, stockage dans les dépressions, infiltration, écoulements). Les données d'étude et les approches méthodologiques sont détaillées, incluant la détermination des aires d'influence des postes et des termes du bilan hydrique, avec une justification du choix de la méthode d'estimation. L'analyse des résultats porte sur l'analyse des aires des postes pluviométriques et du bilan hydrologique, incluant sa variabilité spatio-temporelle et le volume d'eau annuel par ruissellement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".