MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108067747 · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102298

Is globalization a threat to Europe? Winning and losing territories in the first quarter of the twenty-first century

2025· article· en· W7108067747 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Sciences & Humanities Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Regional Development FundMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsGlobalizationPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Metropolitan areaSettlement (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• This article explores, from a spatial perspective, what the globalization of the economy means for Europe. • Today Europe is a continent of tertiary countries, but the settlement system corresponds to a productive structure. • Globalization in Europe has generated a process with negative consequences for rural areas and small and medium-sized cities. • The positive effects of globalization are concentrated in the large metropolitan areas of each country. • Anti-Globalization discourse in losing areas boosts political support for extremist and populist forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Sciences & Humanities OpenSame topicUrban Planning and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207