MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108082789 · doi:10.63332/joph.v4i2.3713

The Role of Health Administration, Social Services, Health Informatics, and Public Health in Driving Digital Transformation in Healthcare Systems: An Integrative Review

2024· article· W7108082789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Posthumanism · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital healthHealth informaticsHealth carePublic health informaticsHealth Administration InformaticsPublic healthInformaticsBig dataDigital transformation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Machine learning, Artificial intelligence and mobile medical software and apps that help physicians' everyday clinical choices are just a few examples of how digital technologies have been revolutionizing healthcare. Tools for digital health have great possibilities for enhancing the performance of personal healthcare in addition to our ability to identify and treat illnesses. Aim of work: for exploring the vital role that public health, social services, health administration, and health informatics play in promoting digital transformation in healthcare systems. Methods: We used the following search phrases to perform an extensive search in the MEDLINE database: role, digital transformation, public health, enhancing, health informatics, and health administration. We conducted a Google Scholar search to discover and look over scholarly reviews related to my review. Certain criteria for inclusion had an impact on the choosing of articles. Results: With distinct headers in the discussion part, the study was divided into several sections. Conclusion: The complete integration of data analytics, digital technologies and creative procedures to improve the quality of healthcare services is known as "digital transformation" in the healthcare section. For the treatment of non-communicable diseases, digital services can be both economical and effective; yet, their generalizability is constrained by the variable treatment effects. To collect, analyze, and apply data to improve health outcomes, health informatics integrates data science, data analytics and information management. To increase the effectiveness of healthcare organizations, technologists create and evaluate data collecting and usage platforms. The usage of advanced analytics technologies and the ongoing geometric development in the quantity of data that can be analyzed will affect almost every side of healthcare, including the management procedures automation, the quality of insurance rates, and the usage of AI in diagnosis. Some important aspects of digital healthcare transformation include Electronic health records, Data analytics, Artificial intelligence, Telemedicine and Wearable devices. Patients can utilize patient portals to access personal health information such as appointment data, medication information and test results. The digital services effects are on the health of population, expenses, and healthcare professional and patient satisfaction, as well as to pinpoint factors that promote and hinder the use of digital services in social welfare and healthcare. Growing in popularity, health information technology enables healthcare medical facilities to use pertinent data to scale forecast and operations treatment outcomes through information systems communication. Automation in the medical field can considerably boost efficiency in numerous healthcare administration jobs like: Streamlining appointment scheduling, maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations and laws, Managing work schedules for caregivers and other staff members and Keeping patient health information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it