Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Civil Religiosity is the application of public international law (PIL) rule of law (RoL) secular state civility virtue ethics philosophy to the field of civil religion religiosity civics. It is being developed through decades of internationally awarded works in the fields of positive peace studies, supreme courts amicus curiae paralegal jurisprudence, international humanitarian law (IHL) assessment, public policymaking, constitutional development, nonprofit philanthropic regulatory compliance, open science, open education, world heritage convention (WHC), cultural diplomacy, interconvictional interfaith diplomacy, welfare programmes establishment, sustainable development goals (SDGs) green logistics social environmental governance (ESG). It was compiled for the Geneva United Nations (UN) Universal Declaration for the Human Rights Seventy Fifth Anniversary Summit (UDHR+75) Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) Interfaith Council of Experts Conference and vastly reviewed for my masterclass at the last positivist Temple of Humanity in Porto Alegre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it