MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108216875 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17782831

Family Open Governance

2016· article· W7108216875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCoaching Methods and Impact
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Corporate governanceSelf-governanceMental healthClosure (psychology)Center (category theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Family Open Governance is the culture of peace application of the best open justice, open ethics, open governance, open science, and free libre open source solutions (FLOSS) to the nonviolent rule of law (RoL) management of familial individual daily lives mental health psyche-social support (MHPSS), relational conflict resolution diplomacy, joint assets secure operational development (DevSecOps), and non-compliant personal projects curatorship. It is being developed through a lifetime of social parenting of individuals, clans, and communities through my own family's negligences and exclusions even after receiving some of the most respected international awards. It was compiled for a series of meeting with scholars of the Opus Dei Catholic Order study group of the Sumaré University Studies Center with the purpose to establish a precedent in ontological family studies and reviewed for courses in the Movement of the Landless People (MST) Education Summit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1510.076

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it