MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108230199 · doi:10.48620/92763

High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) for Assessment of Avascular Necrosis of the Lunate.

2025· article· en· W7108230199 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access CRIS of the University of Bern · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsHand and Upper Limb Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvascular necrosisAsymptomaticSubchondral bonePathologicalPeripheralQuantitative computed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This exploratory study investigates the feasibility and diagnostic value of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in detecting structural and microarchitectural changes in lunate avascular necrosis (AVN), or Kienböck's disease. Five adult patients with unilateral AVN underwent either MRI or CT, alongside HR-pQCT of both wrists. Imaging features such as subchondral remodeling, joint space narrowing, and bone fragmentation were assessed across modalities. HR-pQCT detected at least one additional pathological feature not seen on MRI or CT in four of five patients and revealed early subchondral changes in two contralateral asymptomatic wrists. Quantitative measurements of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) further indicated altered trabecular structure correlating with disease stage. These findings suggest that HR-pQCT may offer enhanced sensitivity for early-stage AVN and better delineation of disease extent, which is critical for informed surgical planning. While limited by small sample size, this study provides preliminary evidence supporting HR-pQCT as a complementary imaging tool in the assessment of lunate AVN, with potential to improve early detection, staging accuracy, and individualized treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access CRIS of the University of BernSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207