MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108230369 · doi:10.20383/103.01536

Beyond Climate Warming: How Salinization Accelerates Deoxygenation in Lakes

2025· dataset· W7108230369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFederated Research Data Repository · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypolimnionWatershedVineyardHydrology (agriculture)San JoaquinNetCDFGeospatial analysisTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset provides a harmonized collection of lake- and watershed-scale attributes, time series, and analysis code used to evaluate salinization-driven deoxygenation in lakes across Canada and the contiguous United States. It includes a lake attributes table for 144 study lakes (coordinates, morphometry, residence time, stratification metrics such as BVF(t,S), and deep-water chemistry including hypolimnetic Cl/SC and DO), together with linked watershed descriptors derived from HydroLAKES, GLOBathy, BasinATLAS and global land-use/land-cover products (population density, fraction urban, road density, watershed-to-lake area ratio, climate statistics, and snow cover). Annual mean hypolimnetic DO and salinity proxies are provided for each lake for 1988–2022, along with a companion time-series_plots folder (zip file) containing 144 lake-specific JPG figures that visualize these trends. A separate table lists HydroLAKES waterbodies in Canada and the United States predicted to be at risk of salinization-driven deoxygenation based on the logistic-regression framework described in the associated manuscript. The repository also includes the core Python scripts used for data pre-processing, geospatial extraction, clustering, statistical analyses, and figure generation, enabling users to reproduce and extend the workflows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederated Research Data RepositoryFrench-language works237,207