MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108319715 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17788681

GAMBLING AND SHADOW ECONOMIES: SOCIO-MORAL DECAY AND FOREIGN POLICY BEHAVIOR (2001-2025)

2025· article· en· W7108319715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Systems and Global Transformations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadow (psychology)LegitimacyNormativeForeign policyContext (archaeology)State (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)Politics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gambling economies and shadow economic structures have emerged as dynamic processes causing fundamental transformations in the social, moral, and political fabric of states during the first quarter of the twenty-first century. This study analyzes the multilayered relationship between the expansion of gambling economies and shadow economic networks, the socio-moral decay they create in the internal structures of states, and foreign policy behaviors within the context of the 2001-2025 period. The fundamental research question examines through which mechanisms and how the expansion of gambling economies and shadow economic networks during this period affects the social and moral structures of states and their foreign policy behaviors. The study's hypothesis posits that as gambling economies and shadow economic networks expand, socio-moral decay within the state accelerates, and as a result of this decay, foreign policy behavior transforms into a structure that is more inconsistent, unpredictable, and based on short-term interest optimization. The research employs qualitative methodology, and its theoretical framework is grounded in realist school, structural functionalism, constructivism, and critical security theories. Findings demonstrate that gambling economies influence foreign policy behavior through fiscal, institutional, and normative mechanisms. The fiscal mechanism constrains the use of foreign policy instruments by reducing state revenues, the institutional mechanism opacifies decision-making processes, and the normative mechanism undermines foreign policy legitimacy by eroding social trust. The original contribution of this study lies in treating gambling economies not merely as an economic phenomenon but as a mechanism that corrodes the moral foundations of state institutions and degrades foreign policy behaviors. Research findings reveal that gambling and shadow economies must now be addressed not only as economic issues but also as social, political, and international security concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it