MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108320694 · doi:10.1080/13549839.2025.2596719

Climate moves: reaching for threshold knowledge one walk at a time

2025· article· en· W7108320694 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueLocal Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainability and Climate Change Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClimate changeKnowledge productionProduction (economics)Climate system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walking the Talk: Climate Moves is an interdisciplinary, intergenerational, intercultural collaboration of scholars and community stakeholders in Canada and the US that leverages walking as relational research and pedagogical method for action on climate. Walking the Talk turns to walking as a repeated, durational, embodied mode of learning, to help participants attune to local ecologies and reach for threshold knowledge of the interdependence between human, more-than-human, and ecosystem flourishing. This article, written midway through the pilot year, situates and reflects on learnings so far. Findings from the Kansas mirror lab show that regular walking cultivates relational connections, multispecies awareness, and embodied threshold concepts such as interdependence, with participants reporting increased ecological attunement, wellbeing, and recognition of walking itself as climate action. These insights suggest that walking methodologies are accessible, locally adaptable tools for cultural and organisational shifts towards climate justice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLocal EnvironmentSame topicSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceFrench-language works237,207