Design, Development and Validation of 3D Printed Toroidal Pressure Vessel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Toroidal pressure vessels find their application in the aerospace industry in places of space optimization. The geometry supports by utilizing the available volume effectively. High pressure fluid is stored and transported in the vehicle using these pressure vessels. With advancements in the area of 3D printing of metallic structures, the toroidal pressure vessel becomes an apt candidate owing to the fabrication challenges for this unique geometry. Strength based design is carried out considering the properties of the 3D printing Titanium alloy. The realized hardware is subjected to proof pressure cycle for design validation and to ensure availability of necessary design factors. Further, cyclic pressure qualification of the toroidal pressure vessel is done at a ground test facility to validate a minimum fatigue life. This work therefore provides a wholesome view of design, development and experimental validation of the 3D printed toroidal pressure vessel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it