MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108440706 · doi:10.1109/tii.2025.3629855

Learning Beyond Time: Transformation-Aware Diffusion for Data-Augmented Soft-Sensor Modeling

2025· article· W7108440706 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOverfittingRobustness (evolution)Representation (politics)WaveletNoise reductionData modelingGeneralizationPrincipal component analysisProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In industrial soft-sensor modeling, the scarcity and imbalance of process data often lead to overfitting and poor generalization of predictive models. To address these challenges, this article proposes a transformation-aware diffusion model (TA-DM) that integrates transformed-domain supervision for data-augmented soft sensing. We explore transformation-aware designs and introduce a novel structure-breaking loss framework that enhances the denoising objectives of denoising diffusion implicit model and TimeDDIM by encouraging the model to disrupt redundant patterns and capture richer structural variations. In implementation, our proposed approach formulates loss functions across multiple transformation domains—including discrete Fourier transform, wavelet transform, and principal component analysis (PCA)—to explicitly guide the model in learning complementary and diverse structural features beyond the original time domain, significantly advancing the representational quality and diversity of generated time-series data. To further bridge the discrepancy between the data generated by TA-DM and the real data, we propose a just-in-time learning-based sample selection strategy. This strategy leverages the representation space of the diffusion model to adaptively select local samples relevant to the current operating condition through similarity matching. These samples are then fused with limited real data to improve soft-sensor modeling. This targeted augmentation effectively narrows the synthetic-real domain gap and enhances model robustness under complex conditions. Experimental results on a numerical example and real-world industrial datasets demonstrate that TA-DM significantly outperforms existing augmentation baselines under data-scarce and distribution-shifting scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207