MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108457882 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/rkzc9

Intraseasonal Waning of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness and Optimal Timing for Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Programs - Scoping Review Protocol

2025· other· W7108457882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationSeasonal influenzaInfluenza vaccineTransmission (telecommunications)EpidemiologyHerd immunityLive attenuated influenza vaccine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the northern hemisphere, including Canada, influenza vaccination is generally recommended prior to the beginning of the season, usually in October, as it takes approximately two weeks for the vaccine to provide maximum protection (NACI, 2024; ACIP, 2024; JCVI, 2024). Some jurisdictions recommend earlier vaccination (July to September) for certain groups, including children and pregnant individuals in their third trimester, to provide early protection for both children and newborns (ACIP, 2024; JCVI, 2024).. In Canada, the majority of influenza vaccine uptake occurs between October and November, and influenza activity typically peaks in January and February – although post-COVID-19 pandemic, the peak has been observed earlier in December and January (Table S1). Current seasonal influenza vaccines vary in effectiveness due to epidemiological factors such as the match between circulating and vaccine strains, as well as host-related factors such as age, pre-existing vaccine and/or infection-induced immunity, and underlying comorbidities (Dhakal et al., 2019; Beran et al., 2021). The optimal timing of influenza vaccination depends on several factors, including transmission patterns and viral evolution of influenza, individual factors (such as travel and pregnancy), waning immunity, and public health logistics. Key considerations for program timing include seasonal influenza circulation patterns, historical trends, peak immunity, duration of protection, strain match, target groups, vaccine availability, and opportunities for co-administration. For example, vaccinating too early (e.g., August-September) potentially risks waning immunity before the peak of influenza season, while vaccinating too late (e.g., December-January) may leave many individuals vulnerable to infection before immunity develops. Such considerations will become increasingly important with the introduction of combination vaccines, such as combination COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, where the optimal timing of vaccination against more than one disease will need to be considered. The current review aims to: 1) summarize recent evidence on intra-seasonal waning protection conferred by seasonal influenza vaccines; and 2) scope existing research and regulatory discussions regarding the optimal timing for seasonal influenza vaccination programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207