MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108472195 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4496

Incidence of thrombosis and bleeding in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy: A multicentric retrospective analysis of the Canadian experience

2025· article· en· W7108472195 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityVancouver General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontJuravinski Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombosisRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)PopulationVenous thrombosisDeep veinCytokine release syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Autologous genetically modified T cells armed with CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have revolutionized treatment strategies and significantly modified the outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies. However, this therapeutic modality comes at the expense of significant treatment-related complications, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), and prolonged cytopenias. Most patients who receive CAR-T cell infusions develop CRS, characterized by a storm of cytokines that leads to a systemic inflammatory response manifested by fever, hypoxemia, and organ dysfunction. This inflammatory milieu has been variably associated with thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Besides, due to the significant comorbid complications developed by the individuals receiving CAR-T therapies, most centers offer only in-hospital CAR-T infusions, incrementing the risk of thrombotic complications. However, the risk-benefit ratio of thromboprophylaxis in this patient population remains unclear. In this multicentric retrospective study, we aim to determine the incidence of thrombosis and bleeding in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies in Canada. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult individuals with CD19-positive lymphomas or acute lymphoblastic leukemias who received CAR-T cell therapy at eight participating Canadian centres from September 2018 to December 2023. Data on patient demographics (including cardiovascular risk factors and malignancy-related variables) and clinical outcomes up to 90 days following the CAR-T infusion were collected. The outcomes of interest included the development of major venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as proximal lower or upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), defined as the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events per the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis; and death. The incidence of VTE and CRB during the follow-up period were estimated using the cumulative incidence function, treating death as a competing event. Results: Our patient population consisted of 561 individuals who had undergone CAR-T therapy. Three hundred and thirty-two patients (59.2%) received axicabtagene ciloleucel, 210 (37.4%) received tisagenlecleucel, and 19 (3.4%) received brexucabtagene autoleucel. Five hundred and fifty-one (98.2%) had undergone this treatment for CD19-positive lymphomas. 37.8% were female, and the median age was 61 (interquartile range [IQR] 16). 33.2% had a diagnosis of hypertension, 17.1% had diabetes, 10.7% had a renal function of less than 60 mL/min, and the median body mass index was 26.5 (IQR 7.5). 31.2% of patients had a prior diagnosis of VTE, and 6.4% had a prior diagnosis of arterial thromboembolism. 32.9% of patients received anticoagulation therapy before or during the CAR-T treatment, while 9.3% received an antiplatelet agent. Thromboprophylaxis was given to 54.3% of patients, most commonly in the form of low-molecular-weight heparin. Following CAR-T therapy, 87.0% of patients developed CRS and 37.5% developed ICANS. During the 90-day follow-up period, 8.7% of patients died. The cause of death was attributed to disease progression in 65.3% of cases, sepsis in 12.2%, treatment toxicities in 8.2%, cardiovascular cause in 6.1%, bleeding in 4.0% and unknown in 4.0%. At 90 days post-CAR-T, the cumulative incidence of VTE was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8-9.0). No fatal pulmonary embolism was documented. The cumulative incidence of CRB was 6.5% (95% CI 4.7-8.8). There were two fatal bleeding events, both intracranial hemorrhages in patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis but with thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 100). Conclusion: Patients receiving CAR-T therapy for CD19-positive lymphomas or acute lymphoblastic leukemias are at elevated risks of both major VTE and CRB during the 90-day period following CAR-T infusion. Although both thrombotic and bleeding events occurred at similar rates, bleeding was fatal in two cases. Identifying which CAR-T patients should receive thromboprophylaxis during the CAR-T treatment remains a significant challenge. Additional analyses on risk factors for the development of thrombotic and bleeding complications are underway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207