MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108477439 · doi:10.25545/b8dmpi

Search for using theatre as knowledge translation approach for health research

2025· dataset· W7108477439 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNB Dataverse · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLPsycINFOMEDLINEKnowledge translationField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The notes field contains the full MEDLINE (Ovid) search strategy for using theatre as knowledge translation approach for health research. The files in this dataset contains the full MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), EMBASE (Elsevier), and Dissertations & Theses (Proquest) search strategies for this topic. Search dates: (2019-07-25)(2021-07-15) (2023-04-04) (2023-09-01) (2024-07-23) (2025-12-03)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.446
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNB DataverseFrench-language works237,207