MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108515785 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17795426

The Quiet Descent

2025· book· W7108515785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typebook
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirNarrativePossession (linguistics)WifeHonestyLonelinessLived experienceQUIET

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Description: The Quiet Descent is a raw, autoethnographic manuscript documenting the lived experience of a Canadian Armed Forces Intelligence operator during and after the war in Afghanistan. Unlike traditional military memoirs that focus on external kinetics, this text functions as a "black box recording" of the internal psychological landscape. The narrative provides a detailed, step-by-step mapping of psychological erosion—describing trauma not as a sudden event, but as a gradient of decline. Apperley articulates the specific mechanism of "The Mask" (the operational identity) and how it is maintained at the expense of the human core, leading to eventual systemic collapse.David R. Apperley is a Canadian novelist whose work blends emotional honesty with elements of memory, myth, and lived experience. A veteran and lifelong storyteller, he writes about the interior lives of ordinary people facing extraordinary moments. His fiction often explores themes of aging, identity, trauma, and the unspoken ties that bind families together. The Quiet Descent is his most intimate novel to date, drawing on reflections shaped by military service, personal loss, and the quiet, enduring strength of those who stand beside us. He lives north of Toronto with his wife Charlotte,, and a pair of loyal companions: Angus the Sheepadoodle and HRH Murrin the cat. Key Themes & Research Value: The Gradient of Descent: A qualitative analysis of how high-functioning individuals can experience severe mental health erosion without immediate detection by self or peers. The Sentinel Mechanism: A first-person account of hypervigilance and the inability to "de-commission" the threat-detection software of the brain upon returning to civilian life. Identity Dissociation: The text explores the structural split between "The Soldier" (who endures) and "The Man" (who feels), providing a case study for understanding Moral Injury and identity fragmentation. The Mechanics of Recovery: The manuscript documents the transition from "The Descent" to "The Ascent," outlining the non-linear process of re-integrating the fractured self through nature, family, and narrative re-authoring. Context: This document serves as a foundational case study for the Virtual Ego Framework (VEF). It provides the empirical telemetry required to validate theories regarding "Zeno Traps" (recursive trauma loops) and the necessity of "Ego-Transcendence" (Rebooting) in veteran populations.License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Keywords: Canadian Armed Forces, Afghanistan, PTSD, Operational Stress Injury (OSI), Autoethnography, Moral Injury, Intelligence Operations, Veteran Health, Trauma Recovery, VEF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTransactional Analysis in PsychotherapyFrench-language works237,207