MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108645823 · doi:10.5284/1138720

Archaeological Building Recording of the Cornhill Works, Edward Street and Solly Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire

2006· article· en· W7108645823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedevelopmentTowerCarvingQuarter (Canadian coin)Ground floorArchHistoric sitePlan (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In April 2006 ARCUS were commissioned by Merlin Estates Management Ltd to report upon a programme of archaeological building recording undertaken in 2003 of a large five storey building from the Cornhill Works in Sheffield (NGR SK 34728758). The completed report was a requirement of a planning condition prior to the redevelopment of the site. Archaeological recording took the form of room descriptions, measured and annotated floor plans and sections, accompanied by black and white 35mm and medium format photography, colour slides and digital images. The site is characterised by a significant change in level from north to south, forming the Cornhill Works on Edward Street, and the Cambridge Works three storeys above on Solly Street. Both were developed during the nineteenth century, although the site appears to have operated as a single complex until the end of the nineteenth centuy, when the lower part was renamed as the Cornhill Works. The surviving tower building appears to date to the latter quarter of the nineteenth- century and is unusual in having divided access from both the lower and upper Works within a single building. The ground floor is significant in that has an unusual ceiling, being built with brick jack arches supported on cast-iron columns. This is significant in terms of its construction, a technique that was widespread within large cotton mills to act as a means of fireproofing the factory floors. Within Sheffield however, it is associated with grinding workshops, or hulls. Recessed arches at ground level also indicate the provision of ground level power transmission, key features of grinding hulls. Less than ten other sites are known to survive within the city with this ceiling type and therefore the building is an important survival. The first floor has a solid stone flag floor and evidence for line-shafting, with an access hatch to the ground floor. It is likely to have housed machinery involved with cutlery and edge tool production that required no grinding or hot working. Access to both the ground floor and first floor was via an external stone flight of steps against he west elevation of the building. This stair originally continued up to the Solly Street courtyard, although it was sealed off in the early twentieth-century, most likely when the Works was split. The character of the top three floors is noticeably different to the lower two. All the rooms are well provided with windows and small hearths. Evidence for benches along the north wall of the second floor, and a low loading doorway in the south elevation opening onto the Solly Street courtyard indicates that activities related to the assembly, finishing and packaging of cutlery and edge tools may have been undertaken in these areas of the building. The building is one of the few surviving examples of an integrated grinding hull and cutlery workshop. Minimal internal features survive, although this survey has identified sufficient evidence to allow functional interpretations of each floor to be suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207