Las plumas en los rituales inkas de Tambo Viejo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Estado inka reconoció que el mundo natural en el que vivimos coexiste con un mundo invisible y sobrenatural habitado por seres divinos que, desde su perspectiva, tenían influencia en la vida humana. Para establecer y mantener una buena relación con ellos, los inkas vieron conveniente organizar ceremonias rituales y entregar una diversidad de ofrendas. A esta acción de buena voluntad, los dioses reciprocaron enviando lluvias que permitieron buenas cosechas. Los productos ofrecidos como regalos eran los mejores que existían, entre los cuales se encontraban las plumas de aves multicolores. Este artículo aborda las investigaciones arqueológicas realizadas en el centro provincial inka de Tambo Viejo, donde, entre varias de las ofrendas depositadas en almacenes, se hallaron plumas de aves tropicales. Aquí discutimos el uso ritual de estos productos durante la época de los inkas y el significado especial de encontrar estos objetos fuera de la capital del Tawantinsuyu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".