MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108973627 · doi:10.14288/1.0450891

Advancing biocrust research to attain reclamation operational readiness

2025· article· en· W7108973627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand reclamationTailingsField (mathematics)Research programWork (physics)SustainabilityClimate changeSustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The progression from reclamation research to operational application is a path of discovery particularly in the field of biocrusts. Biocrusts, or biological soil crusts, are the interface between the living and nonliving components of soil and are the building blocks of ecological recovery. Biocrusts contribute to soil stability, water retention, carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, and are integral to ecological restoration. Building on completed research requires a comprehensive approach that integrates past findings with innovative methodologies to enhance our understanding and practical application of biocrusts. Since 2019 studies have been undertaken at Gibraltar Mine and other similar mine locations in British Columbia and throughout Canada to understand the role biocrusts may have on tailings dam ecological recovery on coarse substrates that are often prone to wind dispersion. To transition from these research insights to operational readiness, we develop protocols for biocrust cultivation, transplantation, and monitoring. The synthesis of existing data to identify gaps and formulate new research questions involves analyses and systematic reviews of previous studies by extracting overarching patterns and insights. Interdisciplinary partnerships are needed to advance the reference sites, greenhouse trials, and eventual field trials. Pilot projects that test biocrust applications in real-world settings were established. What do we do when we need to re-evaluate unexpected outcomes? The goal is to develop operationally viable, cost-effective, and sustainable biocrust establishment. Developing partnerships with land managers, policymakers, local communities and academia is vital. The creation of technological innovations, such as biocrust propagation systems and remote monitoring tools, can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of biocrust applications. Continuous feedback loops between research and practice allow for iterative improvements and adaptive management strategies. We examine the work completed to date, what worked and what did not work, and how adaptive management drives the research needed to attain operational readiness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicBiocrusts and Microbial EcologyFrench-language works237,207