MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7109014129 · doi:10.1080/10106049.2025.2592891

Shallow water depth (≤5 m) estimation based on single-beam echo sounder and optical satellites

2025· article· en· W7109014129 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGeocarto International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersCentral Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery SciencesSouth China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery SciencesBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEcho soundingWaves and shallow waterMultispectral imageInversion (geology)ReflectivityEcho (communications protocol)SedimentBathymetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study combined single-beam echo sounder data with PlanetScope multispectral data to invert shallow water depth (≤5 m) around Weizhou Island, analyzing how each band's reflectance varies with depth by establishing their quantitative relationship and building nine statistical regression and machine learning models. In the inversion of water depths less than 5 m, the correlation R2 between the blue and green bands and water depth was less than 0.1, while the R2 between the red-edge band and water depth was 0.73. In addition, after classification of the sediment type, water depth inversion improved the correlation between the water depth and reflectance. The random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) models demonstrated the highest accuracy in terms of water depth inversion, with R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.28 m and MAE = 0.18 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeocarto InternationalSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207