Vulnerability analysis of comb product of graphs and related applications in chemical structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Exploring the vulnerability of any real-life network helps designers understand how strongly components or elements of the network are connected and how well they can function if there is any disruption. Any chemical structure can also be considered as a network in which the atoms correspond to the vertices, and the chemical bonds between the atoms correspond to the edges. Let <span class="math inline">\(G=(V, E)\)</span> represent any simple graph with vertex set <span class="math inline">\(V\)</span> and edge set <span class="math inline">\(E\)</span>. The vulnerability measure used in this paper is the paired domination integrity, defined as the minimum of the sum of any paired dominating set <span class="math inline">\(S\)</span> of a graph <span class="math inline">\(G\)</span> and the order of the largest component in the induced subgraph of <span class="math inline">\(V-S\)</span>. The minimum is found by considering all possible paired dominating sets of <span class="math inline">\(G\)</span>. In this paper, we obtain the paired domination integrity of the comb product of paths and cycles. In addition, we extend the study of graph vulnerability to chemical structures.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".