MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7109719635 · doi:10.26108/eckh-a770

Microsatellite analysis of population structure in the Eastern Ribbonsnake, Thamnophis sauritus

2008· article· en· W7109719635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic structureNova scotiaMicrosatellitePopulation structureGene flowPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eastern Ribbonsnake, Thamnophis sauritus, exists in Nova Scotia as a disjunct population in the Southwest region of the province. This small population, estimated at 1000-3000 individuals, is particularly vulnerable to change due to its isolation and, therefore, was classified as 'threatened' in 2002 by COSEWIC. Because very little is known about the behaviour, ecology, and genetic structure of this species, there is a rare opportunity to analyse the dynamics of a disjunct, peripheral population. Understanding the genetic structure of this population is fundamental to designing conservation and management plans for the species. Samples were taken from 83 snakes in the form of tail clippings from 4 different areas in the south western portion of Nova Scotia, as well as an outgroup from Nantucket, Massachusetts. One microsattellite loci was amplified and found to exhibit polymorphism with multiple alleles. Results show that there is evidence for the presence of low to moderate restriction in gene flow between concentrations of Ribbonsnakes in Nova Scotia. Results of this study will aid the Ribbonsnake recovery team in planning for the management and eventual recovery of this species in Nova Scotia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207