MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7109945163 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2025.2587684

Recursive non parametric regression estimation for functional time series data under random censorship

2025· article· en· W7109945163 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime seriesSeries (stratigraphy)Nonparametric statisticsNonparametric regressionEstimationRegression analysisParametric statisticsRegressionEstimation theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.In this article, we extend the work of Slaoui [2020. Recursive non parametric regression estimation for dependent strong mixing functional data, Stat. Inference Stoch. Process, Statist.] in the case of censored data. We study the properties of these regression estimators and compare them to the non parametric non recursive regression estimator. Bias, variance, and mean squared error (MSE) are calculated explicitly. We show that, using a selected wild bootstrap bandwidth procedure and a special step size, our proposed recursive regression estimators enable us to obtain results quite similar to those of the non recursive regression estimator under α mixing conditions in terms of estimation error and much better in terms of computational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207