Computing Oriented Spanners and Their Dilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given a point set P in a metric space and a real number t ≥ 1, an oriented t-spanner is an oriented graph G = (P, E), where for every pair of distinct points p and q in P, the shortest oriented closed walk in G that contains p and q is at most a factor t longer than the perimeter of the smallest triangle in P containing p and q. The oriented dilation of a graph G is the minimum t for which G is an oriented t-spanner. For arbitrary point sets of size n in ℝ^d, where d ≥ 2 is a constant, the only known oriented spanner construction is an oriented 2-spanner with binom(n,2) edges. Moreover, there exists a set P of four points in the plane, for which the oriented dilation is larger than 1.46, for any oriented graph on P. We present the first algorithm that computes, in Euclidean space, a sparse oriented spanner whose oriented dilation is bounded by a constant. More specifically, for any set of n points in ℝ^d, where d is a constant, we construct an oriented (2+ε)-spanner with 𝒪(n) edges in 𝒪(n log n) time and 𝒪(n) space. Our construction uses the well-separated pair decomposition and an algorithm that computes a (1+ε)-approximation of the minimum-perimeter triangle in P containing two given query points in 𝒪(log n) time. While our algorithm is based on first computing a suitable undirected graph and then orienting it, we show that, in general, computing the orientation of an undirected graph that minimises its oriented dilation is NP-hard, even for point sets in the Euclidean plane. We further prove that even if the oriented graph is already given, computing its oriented dilation is APSP-hard for points in a general metric space. We complement this result with an algorithm that approximates the oriented dilation of a given graph in subcubic time for point sets in ℝ^d, where d is a constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".