MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7109984699 · doi:10.7759/cureus.98654

A Rare Case of Pilomatricoma of the Male Breast Mimicking Breast Carcinoma: A Diagnostic Challenge

2025· article· en· W7109984699 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareSt Joseph's Health CentreLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilomatricomaPilomatrixomaPresentation (obstetrics)MicrocalcificationEosinophilicFibroadenomaMammographyBreast imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pilomatricoma is a benign skin adnexal tumour often seen in children and young adults. We report a rare case of pilomatricoma of the breast in a 65-year-old male patient who presented with a palpable breast lump. Initial clinical and radiological evaluation suggested primary breast carcinoma. Histopathological examination showed classic features of a benign pilomatricoma with basaloid matrical cells, shadow (ghost) cells, and a foreign body giant cell reaction. There was only minimal microcalcification present. There was strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of basaloid matrical cells for beta-catenin. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by uncommon breast masses and emphasises the need for histologic confirmation by a tissue biopsy. Pathologists and clinicians should be aware that although pilomatricoma is a common skin adnexal tumour in the head and neck region, it can rarely present as a breast lump. Recognising this uncommon presentation is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207