Leveraging AI to Advance Age-Friendly Care in the Veterans Health Administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unlabelled: The aging population presents a pressing challenge for health care systems, necessitating effective strategies to address the complex needs of older adults. The Veterans Health Administration in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated health care system in the United States, has embraced the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) initiative from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement to ensure safe and high-quality care for older veterans. In AFHS, health care providers consistently use the evidence-based 4Ms framework (what matters, medication, mentation, and mobility) to deliver comprehensive care for older adults in all care settings., This viewpoint paper explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the evidence-based implementation of the AFHS 4Ms framework in the VA to provide optimal care for older adults. By leveraging AI technologies, such as natural language processing, machine learning, large language models, clinical decision support, and data analytics, this viewpoint examines the opportunities and challenges of using AI to support the 4Ms domains in a large, integrated health care system. Furthermore, it discusses the potential benefits of integrating AI-driven decision support systems and predictive analytics to personalize care, reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications, enhance cognitive and mood assessments, and better identify mobility issues and interventions. By examining the intersection of AI and age-friendly care in the VA, this viewpoint highlights the transformative potential of AI to expand 4Ms care and improve the experience of providers and older adults across diverse health care settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".