MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110076330 · doi:10.4230/lipics.aft.2025.30

Ticket to Ride: Locally Steered Source Routing for the Lightning Network

2025· article· en· W7110076330 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraverseTicketRelayTrainRouting (electronic design automation)Overhead (engineering)Channel (broadcasting)LandmarkLatency (audio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Route discovery in the Lightning Network is challenging because senders observe only static channel capacities while real-time balances remain hidden. Existing locally steered schemes such as SpeedyMurmurs protect path privacy but depend on global landmark trees whose maintenance traffic and detours inflate latency and overhead. We present Ticket to Ride (T2R), a locally steered source-routing framework that encodes the set of channels a payment may traverse into a compact ticket - an approximate-membership filter keyed with per-hop Diffie–Hellman secrets. Each relay learns only whether its own outgoing edges are permitted, yielding the same incident-edge privacy as SpeedyMurmurs while eliminating the need to build and maintain global landmark trees or any other shared routing state. Extensive simulations on real snapshots - incorporating churn, silent shutdowns, and random channel saturation - show that T2R boosts end-to-end success by up to 9% and cuts median delay by 1.6× relative to SpeedyMurmurs, all with < 1 kB total overhead and no extra handshakes. Because tickets are processed hop-by-hop and can be prefixed by a trampoline, T2R remains lightweight enough for resource-constrained IoT nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207