Aftereffects of Cultural Intercroppings of Maize or Cassava in Immature Palm Groves on the Production of Fresh Fruit Bunches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In palm cultivation, failure to comply with technical itineraries has disadvantages on the development of oil palm. It is in this context that the present study aimed to evaluate the influence of peasant practices intercropping the cultivation of oil palm at the immature stage with those of maize and cassava on the production of oil palm at the adult stage. To do this, a reasonable choice of palm groves constituted the experimental design. The plots chosen were those aged 16 years which, during their immature phase, were intercropped either with crops of maize (Treatment T1) or with those of cassava (Treatment T2) or without food crops (T0: Control). The results showed that peasant practices of crop intercropping of maize and cassava negatively influenced the productivity of oil palm in palm bunches. The comparison of the results showed that cassava cultivation has more detrimental effects on the productivity of oil palm in palm bunches, compared to that of maize. During the immature phase of the palm groves, it would therefore be wise to dissociate the cultivation of oil palm from those of cassava and maize to avoid, in the long term, any possible harm linked to this cultural association on the production of oil palm. Otherwise, it would be advisable to restore to the soils of immature palm groves, by fertilization, the mineral nutrients exported through the cassava and maize harvests or to reduce the densities of these food crops to reduce competition for mineral nutrients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".