MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110168282 · doi:10.1108/qrde-03-2021-0005

Shifting to online instruction in the epicenter of a U.S. pandemic

2021· article· en· W7110168282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly review of distance education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Quarter (Canadian coin)China2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEpicenter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New York City became the epicenter of the coronavirus within the United States. Over the span of just a few weeks, we went from zero cases, to one case, to having our intensive care units overrun with thousands of people in need of life support, to the military setting up makeshift hospitals in our main convention center, tents set up in the middle of Central Park, and a naval hospital on the Hudson River.It was early March 2020 when news of a novel coronavirus began to dominate news stories across the United States. We had heard about a virus spreading rapidly across China and Europe. In past years, fears of other viruses such as SARS, swine flu, and Ebola had caused false alarm that led to my own belief that the United States would have safeguards in place to ensure that the coronavirus would not reach our country. However, when news of the virus causing extreme loss of life in Italy began to surface, I became concerned.I am an adjunct professor at a university in Queens, New York, and a group of my students from the semester prior had shared their planning and excitement anticipating their once in a lifetime opportunity to study abroad during the spring 2020 semester in Italy. Before class we would discuss their hopes and fears as well as the financial burden placed on their families. Once I realized my former students may have been at risk of contracting the virus, I emailed the group to check in and confirm they were safe and well. The students responded immediately to inform me that the university had decided it was best that they return to the states, complete the rest of the semester online, and choose to quarantine in their homes for at least 14 days. I was relieved to learn that my students were at home reunited with their families, until just before the end of our initial communication they shared that although the media had been reporting a series of screening procedures at American airports, they were not screened either leaving Italy or returning to the United States. They explained that there was a very low risk any students could be infected because the region they were living in had no reported cases. Even though these students assured me that they were well, a feeling of panic began to set in.A first report of a woman who had recently traveled outside the United States and resided in New York City emerged. Soon after, a lawyer working in Midtown Manhattan who had not left his hometown or the city, was reported as infected with the possibility of having spread the virus to hundreds of others. At first, my understanding of this virus led me to believe that only the elderly or immune-compromised could be infected, but within 1 day, I learned that no one was safe. This vicious virus could be contracted by the young and old, as well as the sick or healthy.On March 6, the university sent out an email to faculty notifying them of a “contingency plan,” which included a trial run of online classes on March 10 and 11. Faculty were asked to test their ability to navigate online teaching resources and conduct either synchronous or asynchronous instruction. At this time, I was confident that the test run was strictly precautionary, and I believed face-to-face classes would resume the following week. Students and faculty were told to expect either short-term (14 days) or long-term disruption (14+ days). However, March 9 ended up being our last face-to-face class, even though that was not completely certain at the time. The entire class was present that day, and they appeared to be concerned. The conversations kept coming back to “do you really think this is going to happen?” I felt as if my role as a professor shifted to the role of a parent, trying to comfort them by saying “everything is going to be okay” and making all these promises while knowing inside that I had no experience with online teaching. I was trying to comfort them, but I had no idea what was really going to happen.Once the news that my state could potentially be the epicenter of the pandemic began to spread, the panic of creating an emergency response plan for online instruction set in. The university sent emails saying they would support the faculty, but it was clear they shared the same uncertainty. Department heads asked all faculty to navigate online resources as a way to troubleshoot any issues that could arise while our information technology department was still available. I was confident that I would be able to provide instruction remotely after I had learned how to locate and utilize online teaching and feedback tools available on Blackboard and during a few over-the-phone coaching sessions with a member of our information technology department. The university made swift decisions to fully transition to online learning the week of March 16, 2020. To my surprise, within days, most U.S. universities including my own chose to transition to fully online instruction for the remainder of the semester.In what follows, I share the story of teaching in the U.S. epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic. First, I share my initial plan to successfully provide online instruction and avoid anticipated barriers that may have occurred. Next, I detail student reactions to my intervention strategies and my observations related to student performance during extended online instruction. I also describe barriers to student success such as developing feelings of anxiety and contracting the illness as well as working through my own COVID-19 infection. Finally, I explain how I determined the end of term grades while staying true to my personal vow to maintain a fair stance toward grading during this unprecedented time. Within each of these sections, I describe my journey: my initial plan and what actually happened, including roadblocks, my internal struggles, and what the outcome was. I conclude by reflecting on key themes from this unexpected journey and offer questions for readers to ponder as we move forward in a year where institutions of higher education will continue to grapple with COVID-19.The first day of our switch to online classes was the day student midterm presentations were scheduled to take place. That meant that I was responsible for organizing the order of presentations, evaluating student and I was also responsible for that all students could response to to online learning was I decided that a class would best for all because it was the most to face-to-face instruction. I was confident that each student would be able to present their midterm and would be able to feedback from and their to class, I a and scheduled a class which only to students in my I asked that students check their and ability to in before class To any issues with communication or I the class and students the opportunity to the that best for I that including the of and having the ability to their with would students to and any anxiety they may have been all to and I was of best as an is to that may with instruction. to the test run for online I to avoid and I believed that I would be able to online learning anxiety by to synchronous class issues arise during the first synchronous though the class was who were asked to in during a and test their ability to our online before class students issues with students were to on their first few were after on and and either or loss of students appeared to have to either present or to each the initial online classes students made to how it was to learn students for or to be or to in They explained that even though our class was which most it not offer the same comfort as face-to-face instruction and issues led to communication our first synchronous class, students were their midterm to a group of their Even the students that appeared to have their presentations were or their when they if a caused a to the student would and for the to resume or the if was clear before their students to their place or a to their and think about what they to appeared to through the information they were to it that were not their in order to any this was in it may have with to in class where students offer and after each during face-to-face instruction. this synchronous online class, I was to take the role to offer feedback and after each because there was led me to believe that there was an in their of their role in an online of most were to be on or I had a of to a that and students to and take on a shared for their That was in a to the online transition I a of class to teaching students how to their midterm I shared my own and for and with the day of our first online class students a of the they to present during our first synchronous presentations I that there could potentially be issues with technology and assured students that I confident that they could successfully present their The to the and the had been during face-to-face class time, and I chose to students of the they at the of the online I that the would as a to them plan for their of the following were as 1 toward the midterm an understanding of the of the of questions asked by the professor the of the key in the issues were anticipated and Students issues with and appeared to or to in an online At students were during presentations and were to questions or in a I not was the I when I to midterm knowing students may not have been able to to their the of online was with internal and and as I to the I it to the for because they were not for online I students if they experience and to I students that not experience and not to for their if students that they were but may have been with online and information or were to online for working at institutions of higher learning and the of that it is only to be when it was to maintain the same as if the pandemic not We were all and working during unprecedented no one what the was clear that my to grading this first would my grading decisions I to a and with as I could to be I that I could by my a pandemic I believed that being or making just decisions included having for students that were to learn online when it was not what they up order to the midterm and with I decided to the grading for the of the midterm and to each student for their online I believed that students would that there still a set of with within the but in where may have their I chose to be fair and following the first trial class, the university I at in the decided it was in the best of all to fully transition to online series of emails from the of the university and began to my were all to a clear and to be of the our students Faculty were asked to such as and to technology and We were also to with students that may be with personal related to I was that may with but I was to students with support to ensure they were in my began to conduct to locate that could best for online a of the I strategies from and of best with a I chose to immediately the following strategies to the of my online chose to the first few of synchronous class to a and online I asked questions and students to in I also this as an opportunity to students that I was to making available for student support during and after Students were to me at any and our class the week of online instruction I that each student a to provide I students to and utilize tools such as and other communication to share and to them on and that as role in student in of information by students to and in the online during synchronous class time, I to provide students with feedback after was This meant that my of their would be sent within the university that faculty be of and with I chose to with and email students to my to be with and the to also a of my each day to out to students of and my to for that need order to I to by and to each class and were a at the of each The was also to my students to the for or to for strategies I chose to were to my I began to and with questions or for to or Even though a of the students appeared to be to the online there was a group of students that began to class or during synchronous the of each synchronous I would each student as they on and made a of students that were not one of the first online sessions one student that they were told was no and not be for the remainder of the that class I all of the emails sent by the university that were related to the pandemic or was no that I or of the students not in there were only to with students and the they during this and unprecedented the following class, I chose to the with a of my and students that I need to of the that class in order to ensure and of university would continue to for the remainder of the my for a few students chose to me to explain that their were and In these cases, I my support including sessions and for the the week of online instruction of my students me to share that they were and had for response was if and that we will when you to ensure you will be in the the end of that my own began to experience of the COVID-19 chose to in our and I was left to care for our home and on my Within I began to from and At first, I chose to these it be the of working on a or in a Before I I had a and could my and was and within I a and of I was able to rest for an extended because my illness during a and I was able to resume instruction a for the of the it not my ability to continue synchronous instruction or support was my to provide feedback on were online instruction when the to last was The students in my were education and their that they a plan with of face-to-face and synchronous online instruction was to teaching students how to a and provide a for their decisions that was in learning In a of best to my online instruction had been to support student Students were to with and were to sessions to coaching and feedback on students were of my to their success and my to if I began to I chose to the decisions I made when grading the I was determined to I chose to the for this as a for grading and was to and that may have student most were to and included a for decisions with However, there to be a of or across within the same I that the instruction on how to these as well as a of resources were during class and available to students to synchronous sessions on the class I to a fair or just in my to I about the students that were not and who not synchronous classes or I they of the their I a to the of students that not class and chose to of these students but not all made the same that were with the I had I began to what the fair or just be for this order to be I I would need to my to grading each for that chose to in synchronous classes or I on my when grading and my of being fair and when grading student during the pandemic. The was I chose to the for this to the grading of most but chose not to for student that I had as a in certain for this was that my instruction including and resources have been I chose to for student and sessions that were to students that appeared to to these is to that of the students that were sessions to clear up all and students their to last and I had and their it was clear that my first to ensure all students learn and was not completely most students class, and me when they support, there was a group of students that to I to and set out to locate strategies or I could immediately to support my and up the and to and strategies I had not about up to this was not before I a by a professor at related to best for teaching In his and The and for teaching the 10 best for teaching that the following to the of online be present at the a online a set of for and as to how you will and how students be a of and synchronous and asynchronous for feedback early in the term that and out and resources that available in if learning with personal a and for the of and teaching I realized that I had of the strategies they I had a online by and to be available to support students outside of our scheduled class time. In I set by developing and learning to and students to or group or the of working I that each class included synchronous instruction as well as asynchronous such as and to in to share and on Students were also able to resources in that were and available on our such as students how they be for and planning a or for the were I had not this I was to any and all strategies to ensure my students were I describe how I chose to these feedback and have me on and the of my instruction. Before the transition to online I tools such as to feedback from I have also at the end of each face-to-face class to me the of understanding and to inform my planning However, during the first of online I to utilize the tools to I had to a synchronous and sessions were by a group of students and made it a to any information from with began to utilize tools such as and to support student I a a to student This feedback my ability to class time, present and maintain a when I also the questions to learn about related to the of certain and to what they and not about our online were also as a to feedback related to the of my instruction and to me students in need of I a and asked students to complete and it after each a way to student and I asked students to complete it during class time. I assured students that this would not be and would be to plan instruction. a of students in my chose to utilize these and I them when instruction and that in feeling and believed they were of these I felt it was my to them I was in my to teaching and grading and chose to to with students before or after class or during a they could and complete their best these I shared and each to them a to complete past before the This appeared to be the most in students back on I and to choose a or for the I immediately this to In of reflecting in an I believe it is to to by returning to the or for or the as a of until the class to a or I began to up each class by students to the at the of class and on their or I each by students to I that I not a few am I of that I could not just a students responded to this and were able to their success or need for was also on the day of the I began class by the that were shared on the first day of the I a to students or not they the for this students were and appeared to be with their performance unexpected and strategies with best for online instruction had been in my there were a few or barriers that may have with student success during the week of this students began to share feelings of and a of students class, not and not to my to the week of synchronous class sessions students appeared to be They were in for class and in conversations with to share their and feelings of They feeling and as a of the news and being to their They shared the issues they were in other classes such as a transition to online instruction as a to and an to to questions and became clear that the students were an and were not to that were the strategies had been to support students that class, there was no I could locate in the to with students that chose to class, not or to to the made to students that were present during face-to-face classes and of the first synchronous sessions students were still in the and their were included on my but I was to them or email until the last few of the student chose to to my email the day before the to explain that and left to class and to complete the In this I on my to be and in my to teaching. I assured the student that I was confident in ability to complete the and it before my grades were in. chose to my offer and was able to the and the other student decided to me a of on the day after the was feelings of for the to support success but shared that the chose to take of the this semester by the the for the was still able to the In this I to or not there were strategies that I could have to this student to complete the I not any resources that me any but I will continue to out in this were and end of term grades were in I and grading and to each online until this in time, grades for students in my had not been for each were up and with a Once the of grading had me and how to the best the and the fair in of grading at the of the pandemic included being and This meant I would be and just when grading but would also the and students were to through during this time. the of living and working during a I to choose an or that could be when trying to a I the by each student and to it with the I was most grades appeared to with a I could have on student there were students that were 1 to the they The only grading left to in was chose to the grading for the to the before the of the in class as well as an role during class students a class either face-to-face or online, were questions and in during all class and were to out support by group I asked students were not being for online classes or to for any because of the not students that an of and to in any be I just in my ability to in conversations with students and had their to offer I believed that in order to be fair and have I have a understanding of student of the grading The the fair was to with students to I decided to students to and the on the as a I that all students and Once the grades were the toward end of semester I grades for students to and that they me if they had any or believed the was In the no students were in and I was confident that this the I had during the was the most story of my journey teaching through a pandemic is because it to the that were shared by thousands of students and and working at universities all the I on this and I that I have in my ability to through my and I was able to support my students and in order to barriers that may have with teaching and a week of to online it was clear that and for students would as the of my own best during a pandemic. This meant creating online learning that the face-to-face instruction in I set chose to and for students to in learning by working in with and in for students was also through my to available and online student in need of support was able to me to and Students to share how it was to they could on their professor to be there when they living and working through a a and teaching during a pandemic been a when I have a of in order to learn about best to the of I had not teaching online and not have any in instruction that may have me support I began to issues that as the of rapidly to online my response was I chose to in to to barriers that with my ability to provide instruction. resources to support online instruction were available at my I am confident that my to of the strategies I learned about be for the success of my most learned through my experience teaching during a pandemic may be that grading students to with This that to to their feelings or the they may be living or working I believe that when it to grading it be or teaching face-to-face or online, in New York City or any other across the it may be for all to what it to and their best to be when making decisions related to forward there to be about what expect their classes to in the coming of what the will may or not face-to-face We have heard a with face-to-face and personal with up students in classes may be in place is also the possibility of all online instruction. questions about how will students not up for online which and The only that is certain is uncertainty. we is move forward with the learned in these last few and with a to continue our students with would you describe the with which the was you the was this to describe what is you will me plan and I will with you to clear up of take to on this about what you have learned in class and and while

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly review of distance educationSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207