MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7110214656 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.03.25341486

Changes in the Genital Microbiome and Inflammation Among Women Using 30-Day <i>L. Rhamnosus/L. Reuteri</i> Probiotic in Combination with Intravaginal Estradiol: Findings from a Pilot, Open-Label, Phase I Clinical Trial

2025· article· W7110214656 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkLawson Health Research InstituteWestern UniversityWomen's Health In Women's HandsMcMaster University Medical CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHealth CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsBacterial vaginosisProbioticMicrobiomeVaginaSex organLactobacillusVaginal disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A dysbiotic genital microbiome can cause inflammation, higher sexually transmitted infection risk, and long-term effects even when asymptomatic. Probiotic Lactobacillus species can potentially improve the genital microbial environment, especially among women with bacterial vaginosis (BV). Further, the hormone estradiol has been linked to mucosal health and better Lactobacillus colonization. We evaluated the impact of intravaginal estradiol, with/without use of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Limosilactobacillus reuteri RC-14, administered vaginally or orally, on the genital microbiome and inflammation. Through this pilot Phase I, randomized, open-label trial, fifty premenopausal African, Caribbean, and Black women, were randomized to four study arms: intravaginal estradiol (Estring©; 7.5mg/day); vaginal probiotic (RepHresh Pro-B™) twice daily; combination of Estring© and vaginal RepHresh Pro-B™ (twice daily); or the Estring© and oral RepHresh Pro-B™ (twice daily), for 30 days. Baseline BV status was determined by Nugent scoring. The genital microbial composition was measured by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and inflammation using a 48-plex Luminex cytokine assay. By mid-intervention, probiotic Lactobacillus taxa were detected in the genital tract in the vaginal probiotic only (p<0.01) and vaginal probiotic + Estring arms (p=0.03), but not with oral administration, although abundances returned to baseline levels post-treatment. 51.3% of participants experienced an overall positive shift in microbial composition by end-of-treatment. At follow-up, despite the decrease in probiotic species abundances, total Lactobacillus abundance, mostly L. iners , remained higher compared to pre-treatment (68.9% vs 60.9%), with lower overall alpha diversity (p=0.04). Further, this change was accompanied by a consistent decrease in inflammation from baseline to end-of-intervention (p=0.04), and 7 days post-treatment (p=0.05), significantly so at all visits among those with an overall positive microbial shift (all p<0.05). Overall, our findings demonstrate that microbiome-targeted interventions have the capacity to positively modulate the genital microbial and inflammatory milieu, with factors such as the route of administration playing a key role. Panel: Research in context Evidence before this study The vaginal microbiome is a critical determinant of reproductive health and HIV susceptibility. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a genital condition characterized by the depletion of protective Lactobacillus species and an overabundance of dysbiotic anaerobes, which leads to high inflammation levels and increased risk of sexually transmitted infection acquisition. Treating with antibiotics, which is the standard of care for BV, leads to recurrence rates exceeding 50% within a year. Promising studies assessing the effectiveness of live probiotics have been shown in some studies to decrease BV recurrence rates, but have yielded inconsistent results, especially with oral delivery. Additionally, low-dose intravaginal estrogen was found to enhance Lactobacillus dominance in postmenopausal women. However, its combined effect with probiotics in premenopausal women, including among African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) women who are disproportionately affected by BV and HIV, remains poorly understood. Added value of this study This randomized, open-label, phase I trial was, to our knowledge, the first to compare oral versus vaginal delivery of L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14, with or without intravaginal estrogen, among premenopausal ACB women. Vaginally-administered probiotics were successfully detected in the vaginal tract, albeit temporarily, led to increased Lactobacillus abundance, reduced BV-associated anaerobes abundance, and decreased overall genital inflammation levels. Importantly, these shifts in microbial composition, including an increase in Lactobacillus spp. abundance persisted beyond treatment with vaginal probiotic use. Implications of all the available evidence Our findings suggest that vaginal probiotic use with/without estrogen can support the establishment of a more optimal vaginal microbiome and reduce inflammation - two factors central to genital health and HIV prevention. Route of administration was key to detection of the probiotic taxa in the genital tract. Larger studies are needed to determine the longer-term impact of these microbial and immune improvements on BV recurrence and risk of sexually transmitted infection acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicReproductive tract infections research→French-language works237,207→