MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110237132 · doi:10.4230/lipics.icalp.2025.72

k-Leaf Powers Cannot Be Characterized by a Finite Set of Forbidden Induced Subgraphs for k ≥ 5

2025· article· en· W7110237132 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChordal graphSplit graphInterval graphFinite setMaximal independent setDistance-hereditary graphInduced subgraphIndifference graphBlock graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A graph G = (V,E) is a k-leaf power if there is a tree T whose leaves are the vertices of G, with the property that a pair of distinct leaves u and v share an edge in G if and only if they are distance at most k apart in T. For k ≤ 4, it is known that there exists a finite set F_k of graphs such that the class ℒ(k) of k-leaf power graphs is characterized as the set of strongly chordal graphs that do not contain any graph in F_k as an induced subgraph. We prove no such characterization holds for k ≥ 5. That is, for any k ≥ 5, there is no finite set F_k of graphs such that ℒ(k) is equivalent to the set of strongly chordal graphs that do not contain as an induced subgraph any graph in F_k.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)Same topicGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsFrench-language works237,207