MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110307662 · doi:10.1007/s42965-025-00407-7

Plant controls over tropical wetland nitrous oxide dynamics: a review

2025· article· en· W7110307662 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTropical Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersRoyal Geographical SocietyNatural Environment Research CouncilRoyal Society
KeywordsWetlandNitrous oxideVegetation (pathology)EcosystemGreenhouse gasRhizosphereNitrogen cycleTropics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tropical wetlands are an important global source of greenhouse gas emissions, including nitrous oxide, a potent and long-lasting greenhouse gas. Tropical wetland ecosystems can be highly heterogeneous, featuring a variety of vegetation types, from grasses through to palms and mangroves. While soil conditions (particularly soil moisture and pH) are essential for determining the formation of nitrous oxide in soils, plants have a central role in determining the balance of emissions. In this review, we summarise the importance of vegetation in regulating tropical wetland nitrous oxide dynamics. We show how a variety of plant-mediated processes can exert key controls over wetland plant-soil nitrogen transportation and transformations. Key mechanisms of plant regulation of dynamics include influencing substrate availability (carbon and nitrogen) through litter inputs, rhizodeposition, root turnover and plant nitrogen uptake, rhizosphere biology, and plant-mediated nitrous oxide transportation, all of which can vary between species and dominant vegetation types. We propose that there is a critical need to better quantify such processes across dominant wetland ecotypes, to support improved upscaling of emissions, and assess their sensitivity to future environmental change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTropical EcologySame topicPlant responses to water stressFrench-language works237,207