MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110390118 · doi:10.26108/bq36-k220

Distribution, movements, morphology and reproduction in a population of Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) in an unprotected landscape in southwestern Nova Scotia

2002· article· en· W7110390118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaOverwinteringTurtle (robot)Nest (protein structural motif)PopulationNational parkReproductionRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior to 1996, the only known concentrations of Blanding's turtle in Nova Scotia occurred in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site (KNP). In 1996, a campaign based on information posters and surveys was initiated to enlist the public's help in locating turtles in unprotected landscapes. The successful campaign increased the known range of Blanding's turtle in Nova Scotia and helped to identify the first known population outside the Park, at McGowan Lake. Distribution, movements, morphology and reproduction in this population were studied from 1997-2001 by live-trapping, visual sampling and radiotelemetry. This population differs surprisingly from the KNP population: at McGowan Lake most nests occur inland, often on slate outcrops, rather than on lakeshore beaches; nesting effort is apparently increased, with females making a high number of unsuccessful nest attempts; home ranges are small, with dense seasonal aggregations in summer drought refuges and overwintering locations that probably increase vulnerability; adults are smaller and females lay smaller clutches. These differences illustrate that conservation and research must be at an appropriate scale to accommodate local variability of this species in Nova Scotia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207