MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110485861

Mankowski's Commercial Law - Article-by-Article Commentary

2025· book· en· W7110485861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) · 2025
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionDirectiveCarriageLegislationInternational trade lawUnificationPayment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective cross-border trade depends on reliable rules and legal certainty. However, cross-border trade is a complex undertaking, not limited only to sales, but also encompassing carriage and transport, finance, and marketing. Accordingly, a clear understanding of the legislation underpinning the major areas of commercial law is absolutely essential for successful international commerce. Written in English by a team of international experts, the second edition of this leading Commentary contains revised and updated article-by-article analyses of: Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods (LPC) UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) Incoterms© 2020 Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) COTIF Uniform Rules Concerning the Contract of International Carriage of Passengers (CIV) and Goods (CIM) Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (Montreal Convention) Budapest Convention on the Contract for the Carriage of Goods by Inland Waterway (CMNI) EU Commercial Agents Directive 86/653 EU Late Payment Directive 2011/7 Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment (Cape Town Convention) Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits (UPC 600)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg)Same topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207