Traslucir la catedral románica de Girona: primicias en la recepción del arte de la vidriera en la Península Ibérica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2019, as a result of the restoration of the Renaissance altarpiece by Antoni Coll installed in the Corpus Christi chapel, once dedicated to Saint Martin and Saint Francis, in the cathedral of Santa Maria de Girona, an exceptional stained-glass window was found. The painstaking restoration carried out in 2020 and 2021 has brought back light to some pieces of extraordinary value that had been obliterated by masking. This stained-glass window is the result of a reuse of early Gothic pieces combined with others from the first generation of International Gothic, presumably implented around 1400. The earliest glass in this window, which can be dated to the first quarter of the 13th century, is therefore contemporary with the four early stained-glass windows in the monastery of Las Huelgas (Burgos). Both windows are the result of the establishment and organization of glassmakers' workshops from different French domains. The arrival of Aquitanian and Picardic craftsmen is superimposed on the pre-existence of glassmakers somewhere in Catalonia, around 1200 or a little earlier, if we accept the attribution to that territory of a stained-glass window conserved in the Worcester Art Museum
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".