MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110592928

Burnt Area Monitoring Using Graph Convolutional Networks Based On Multi-Sensor Satellite Data

2025· other· W7110592928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround truthDeep learningSegmentationProduct (mathematics)SatelliteFocus (optics)GraphHigh resolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent catastrophic wildfire seasons, e.g. in Greece 2023, Canada 2023, and Chile 2023/2024, underscore the critical need for rapid and accurate wildfire data to facilitate emergency response, assess environmental damage, and keep the public informed. Although satellite-based thermal anomaly data is accessible in near real-time (NRT), accurately mapping the areas affected by fires from NRT imagery remains a significant challenge. The proposed approach combines a superpixel segmentation algorithm with both rule-based and deep learning classification techniques to reliably identify burnt areas (BA) in NRT. This method is compatible with a range of optical sensors, from medium to high resolution, and integrates data from diverse sources to continuously refine the detection of burnt areas as active fires unfold. The region of Central Chile, enduring tremendous wildfire events in early 2024, was used as a testing region. An NRT product (DLRBAv2NRT) based on Sentinel-3 OLCI was generated, together with a refined non-time critical product (DLRBAv2NTC). Both products are tested against established global BA products (Copernicus CGLBA31nrt and NASA MCD64A1v061). The DLRBAv2NRT achieved the highest accuracies, outperforming the DLRBAv2NTC product by 5%, the CGLBA31nrt product by 9% and the MCD64A1v061 product by 10% IoU. The DLRBAv2NRT showed the highest sensitivity detecting BA (Recall: 0.78), while MCD64A1v061 produced high number of false negatives (Recall: 0.63). A third variant (DLRBAv2NTCfusion), incorporating results from multiple mid- and high resolution sensors is generated for the Valparaíso focus region. The results are inter-compared with local ground truth data, yielding an IoU of 0.75. The proposed mapping procedure demonstrates a fully-automated, flexible approach to derive burnt area delineations from satellite data in NRT with high accuracy. This allows for high-frequency monitoring of NRT burnt areas on a global scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)French-language works237,207